Yea, its physics day for Nobel Prizes. Humm, do I portray a slight bias there, one that advocates that the only real science is Physics and that the rest is simply stamp collecting? Hat tip to Ernest Rutherford for that observation, and also a tad ironic because he won the Nobel prize in 1908 for Chemistry, not Physics (“for his investigations into the disintegration of the elements, and the chemistry of radioactive substances”).
Now, to be fair to Mr Rutherford, back in his time his observation was a description of what was going on. Chemistry was still heavily mostly focused on the discovery and classification of elements, and biology on the discovery and classification of species, but a lot has (quite obviously) changed since then.
He was also a truly fascinating man and while he did indeed win for Chemistry, he was also very much a physicist as well. Did you know that he performed his most famous work after he had moved to the Victoria University of Manchester in the UK when he was already a Nobel laureate. For example, in 1911 he theorized that atoms have their charge concentrated in a very small nucleus, and so was born the Rutherford model of the atom. In 1917 he was the first to split the atom, and as part of that he also discovered and split the proton.
OK, lets not lose focus, so today is the day for Physics, who has won this in the past? The list is here and as you might expect, many famous names leap out, including Pierre Curie, Marie Curie, Planck, Einstein, Bohr, Hertz, Fermi, Pauli, Feynman, Bethe, Weinberg, etc… it’s a complete who’s who of physics (well of course it is, how could it not be).
And the winners are (as widely predicted by many) ….
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Nobel Prize in Physics for 2012 to
Collège de France and Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
David J. Wineland
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA
“for ground-breaking experimental methods that enable measuring and manipulation of individual quantum systems”
And the details are …
Particle control in a quantum world
Serge Haroche and David J. Wineland have independently invented and developed methods for measuring and manipulating individual particles while preserving their quantum-mechanical nature, in ways that were previously thought unattainable.
The Nobel Laureates have opened the door to a new era of experimentation with quantum physics by demonstrating the direct observation of individual quantum particles without destroying them. For single particles of light or matter the laws of classical physics cease to apply and quantum physics takes over. But single particles are not easily isolated from their surrounding environment and they lose their mysterious quantum properties as soon as they interact with the outside world. Thus many seemingly bizarre phenomena predicted by quantum physics could not be directly observed, and researchers could only carry out thought experiments that might in principle manifest these bizarre phenomena.
Through their ingenious laboratory methods Haroche and Wineland together with their research groups have managed to measure and control very fragile quantum states, which were previously thought inaccessible for direct observation. The new methods allow them to examine, control and count the particles.
Their methods have many things in common. David Wineland traps electrically charged atoms, or ions, controlling and measuring them with light, or photons.
Serge Haroche takes the opposite approach: he controls and measures trapped photons, or particles of light, by sending atoms through a trap.
Both Laureates work in the field of quantum optics studying the fundamental interaction between light and matter, a field which has seen considerable progress since the mid-1980s. Their ground-breaking methods have enabled this field of research to take the very first steps towards building a new type of super fast computer based on quantum physics. Perhaps the quantum computer will change our everyday lives in this century in the same radical way as the classical computer did in the last century. The research has also led to the construction of extremely precise clocks that could become the future basis for a new standard of time, with more than hundred-fold greater precision than present-day caesium clocks.
Read more about this year’s prize Information for the Public
Pdf 365 Kb
Pdf 410 Kb.
To read the text you need Acrobat Reader.
Serge Haroche, French citizen. Born 1944 in Casablanca, Morocco. Ph.D. 1971 from Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Professor at Collège de France and Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.
David J. Wineland, U.S. citizen. Born 1944 in Milwaukee, WI, USA. Ph.D. 1970 from Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Group Leader and NIST Fellow at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA