Notes from Inside the bubble of belief

images-4As a teen I once belonged to a Christian sect that was quite unique in many ways, but then perhaps each and every sect will have unique aspects. These folks did not have Church Buildings, but instead met in each others houses. They also had no clerics and so it was in many ways a very primitive form of Christianity. Perhaps “primitive” is the wrong word, and a better term would be basic. They could perhaps best be described as the happy-clappy crowd, but were into stuff such as speaking in tongues and so were in many respects pentecostal.

It was all my own fault in many ways, I was not drafted, I joined.

How did I get into it?

I was invited to go to a bible study in somebody’s house, and so with visions of several old ladies babbling from the bible I went, not with the thought that this wold be interesting, but rather with the thought that it would be a great way to meet some girls (a human sub-species that was a tad alien to me at that time because I just happened to go to an all-boys school).

It was not what I expected.

No old ladies and nothing dull … there were lots of young people crammed into a room, and Ruth, a 20 something, expounded upon how the spirit of god could fill you and change you. Once she was done, we then embarked upon the emotional roller coaster ride, and sure enough after enough happy-clappy songs, the spirit turned up and we were off on a psychological lift (Any psychologists attending could have made an entire career out of it all).

Net effect: I invested emotionally and so I was in.

But that’s Crazy

I’m now rapidly switching to another scene.

I recall once being on a “Christian” hike and as we walked I expounded upon how the seven days in Genesis were symbolic and not literal. Each day simply corresponded to a specific geological age. (This idea itself is of course nonsense, but I’ll skip over why for now). Upon hearing all this, one of the chaps walking with me turned and asked, “Why is it symbolic, why not seven literal days?”. I recall answering, “Oh yes, how interesting”, and leaving it at that, but I also vividly recall thinking, ‘that is totally crazy, this guy is nuts’.

Now hold that thought, I’ll be coming back to it shortly, I’m about to switch to a third scene.

“They” are wrong, only we are right

I also recall at various times sitting inside this bubble looking out at the other variations of belief that prevailed and thinking that those other specific variations were inferior and not quite as good / right as ours was, and that they simply lacked a bit of additional information. They were sort of Christian, not quite as alien as those in other beliefs, but not “true” Christians like us.

Yes, I know the fallacy in play here, but I’m not going there today.

So where am I going with all this?

There are, as you might imagine, many specific aspects that I could expand upon, and stories to tell, but I wanted to draw out the above three scenarios to focus upon these three points:

  1. Belief is not about accepting and rejecting specific information, but rather is an emotional investment. The associated “facts” used to rationalise it all come later as decoration. This is why belief is essentially immune to factual debunking.
  2. There is no uniformity, individuals will cherry-pick the bits they are conformable with, and simply discard the rest. I might indeed (now) attempt to criticise aspect X of some variation of belief, but you will always find individuals inside the belief who will agree with you, and identify that as wrong, that X is up for reform, and the others have simply not caught up yet. This makes individuals more or less immune to criticism of some of the truly weird stuff.
  3. Point out the truly abhorrent behaviour that beliefs can initiate in the human heart, and believers will simply rationalise it as “Oh, but they are not ‘true’ believers, they got things all wrong”, and that thinking also insulates individuals from the more general criticism of irrational beliefs.

When engaging in a friendly discussion with a believer, it is well-worth knowing the above so that you can avoid becoming frustrated when the immunity to factual information manifests itself.

The initiation of a successful intervention comes not from picking away at the symptoms, (the bad behaviour, the crazy beliefs) but rather from gently undermining the actual foundation itself – “faith”, which as Dr. Peter Boghossian’s Points out, is pretending to know things you do not actually know at all.



Leave a Reply